D.C. Court of Appeals

Morning Docket

Morning Docket: 06.24.15

* Partners at this law firm tried a threesome, but it didn't exactly work out as expected, so now they're scaling it back to just one at a time. (And by this, we of course mean that Porter Scott's three co-managing partners plan was a no-go.) [Sacramento Business Journal] * More than 40 class-action suits have been filed since the Mayweather-Pacquiao fight, with many litigants alleging that they were "duped" into its purchase. Maybe one of them will pack a better punch than the so-called "Fight of the Century." [National Law Journal] * Just because one Biglaw firm went under, in part, because of its brand-spanking new administrative hub, that doesn't mean your firm shouldn't consider opening one. The risk might be worth the reward of saving millions in expenses. [Big Law Business / Bloomberg] * Concordia Law launched a media campaign to attract students, touting the fact that it's been kind of provisionally approved by the ABA as its selling point. It's new slogan is likely "Meh, we're good enough for the ABA, so we're good enough for you." [Idaho Statesman] * Here's some good news for the people who are actually considering taking the D.C. bar exam instead of just waiving in like the rest of civilized society: the D.C. Court of Appeals will finally allow you to type the essay portion of the exam on your laptops. [Legal Times]

Barack Obama

Morning Docket: 11.18.11

* John Wilkes Booth. Lee Harvey Oswald. Oscar Ortega-Hernandez. Sorry, Oscar, you have three names, but you didn’t actually kill the president, so you don’t get to join the club. [New York Times] * Former SCOTUS clerk Roy McLeese III has been nominated for a seat on the D.C. Court of Appeals. I don’t have […]

Sponsored Content

The Hidden Threat: How Fake Identities used by Remote Employees Put Your Business at Risk—and How to Defend Against This

Based on our experience in recent client matters, we have seen an escalating threat posed by the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK) information technology (IT) workers engaging in sophisticated schemes to evade US and UN sanctions, steal intellectual property from US companies, and/or inject ransomware into company IT environments, in support of enhancing North Korea’s illicit weapons program.